- Home
- Blog
- Workout logging
- RPE and RIR: how to rate a set you just did
RPE and RIR: how to rate a set you just did
Two scales for the same thing, why the number belongs in your log, and how to calibrate a rating that most beginners get wrong by three repetitions.
By Gajendra Singh Rathore5 min read
The short answer
- RIR counts repetitions left in the tank; RPE is the same information inverted, where 10 means none left and 8 means two.
- Most productive training sits at 1 to 3 RIR: most of the stimulus at a fraction of the recovery cost of training to failure.
- Beginners typically underestimate how many repetitions they had left by two or three, which improves with occasional sets to genuine failure.
- Recording the rating turns an ambiguous log entry into an actionable one, because the same weight and reps can mean very different sessions.
On this page
A log entry that reads 100 kg × 5 is missing the most important thing about the set: whether it was comfortable or nearly the last repetition you had.
Two scales exist to capture that, and they are the same scale.
The two scales
RIR — reps in reserve. How many more could you have done? Zero means none. Two means two.
RPE — rating of perceived exertion. A 1 to 10 scale where 10 means nothing left. Subtract from 10 to get RIR: RPE 8 is 2 RIR.
Most people find RIR easier, because "how many more could you have done" has a countable answer and "how hard was that out of ten" does not.
| RPE | RIR | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 0 | Could not have done another |
| 9 | 1 | One more was there |
| 8 | 2 | Two more |
| 7 | 3 | Three more |
| 6 | 4+ | Comfortably short |
Why it belongs in the log
Consider two entries a week apart, both reading 100 kg × 5.
If the first was at 0 RIR and the second at 2, you got stronger. If the first was at 2 and the second at 0, you got weaker. Without the rating, both look like a flat line and you would conclude nothing happened.
That is a real signal, appearing in the period between load increases, and it is invisible without this field. It is why the rating is one of the four things worth recording in what to record in a training log, and what to skip.
Why most training sits at 1 to 3 RIR
Sets taken to absolute failure produce a strong stimulus and a large recovery cost. They fatigue the nervous system, extend how long the muscle needs before the next session, and degrade every set that follows in the same workout.
Sets stopped four or five repetitions short contribute relatively little.
The band between — one to three repetitions short — captures most of the stimulus at a fraction of the cost, which is why most well-designed programmes live there and use failure sparingly, typically on isolation work at the end of a session.
Calibrating your rating
Beginners are consistently wrong in one direction: they believe they are closer to failure than they are, often by three or four repetitions.
The fix is occasional calibration. On a safe exercise — a machine, a dumbbell curl, a leg press — take one set to genuine failure. Predict beforehand how many you will get. Compare.
Most people find they had considerably more than they thought. That correction is worth more to their training than any programme change, because it means every subsequent set has been closer to the productive range.
Using it to select load
RPE-based loading solves a real problem: a fixed percentage of your maximum is heavy on a bad day and light on a good one.
"Work up to a set of five at RPE 8" lets the load follow your actual capacity while the intent stays constant. On a day after poor sleep that might be 95 kg; on a good day 105. Both are the same training stimulus.
This is more flexible than percentage-based programming and requires the calibration above to work. For someone in their first six months, fixed loads with double progression are usually the better choice.
Its limits
It is subjective. Two people rating the same set will disagree, and so will the same person on different days. That is tolerable because you are comparing yourself with yourself.
It is harder on high-rep sets. Estimating reps in reserve on a set of twenty is much less reliable than on a set of five.
It drifts. Ratings tend to inflate over a training block as fatigue accumulates and a familiar weight starts to feel harder. That is information rather than error — it is often the first sign that a deload is due, per deload weeks: when you need one and how to tell.
In practice
Write a single digit after each working set. 100 × 5 @ 2. It takes a second and it is the difference between a log that records what the bar did and one that records what you did.
Reading those ratings across a block is one of the four progress signals in how to read real progress out of a training log, and it is the only one that shows improvement while the weight on the bar stays the same.
Questions people ask
- What is the difference between RPE and RIR?
- They describe the same thing from opposite directions. RIR counts the repetitions you could still have completed: 2 RIR means two left. RPE rates the effort on a 1 to 10 scale where 10 means none left, so 2 RIR equals RPE 8. Most people find RIR easier to answer honestly.
- What RPE should I train at?
- Most productive work sits at RPE 7 to 9, which is 1 to 3 repetitions in reserve. Training to failure on every set is effective and expensive: it extends recovery and degrades the sets that follow, so it is used sparingly rather than by default.
- How do I know how many reps I have left?
- Practice, plus occasional calibration. Take a set to genuine failure on a safe exercise such as a machine or a dumbbell curl and compare it with what you predicted. Most beginners discover they had three or four more repetitions than they believed.
- Is RPE useful for beginners?
- Yes, even though beginners rate it poorly. The rating improves precisely by being recorded and corrected, and an imperfect rating logged consistently is more informative than no rating at all.
Sources
- 1.Evidence-based recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest preparation — Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
- 2.Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans — US Department of Health and Human Services
Related reading
- What to record in a training log, and what to skip
Four fields carry nearly all the information. A field-by-field account of what earns its place, what does not, and why the effort field matters most.
- How to log your workouts in under a minute
A training log answers one question next week: did I do more than last time? What to record, what to skip, and how to read progress out of it.
- Progressive overload, in numbers you can check
Five ways to make a session harder than the last one, in the order they are worth using, and what a realistic rate of progress looks like by training age.
- Notebook or app: what a workout log is really for
A notebook has built plenty of strong people. What an app actually adds is arithmetic and instant recall, and those are the only two reasons to prefer one.
More on Workout logging
Keeping a training log that tells you whether you are getting stronger, in less time than the rest between sets.
- What to record in a training log, and what to skip
- Training volume or intensity: what to track
- How many sets per muscle per week is enough?
- Strength plateaus: what a log shows first
- How long to rest between sets, by goal
- How to read real progress out of a training log
- Progressive overload, in numbers you can check
- Notebook or app: what a workout log is really for
- Logging home workouts when nothing has a weight
- How to log cardio without lying to yourself
- Why food and training belong in the same log
- Deload weeks: when you need one and how to tell
- Are the calories-burned numbers worth anything?
- The first twelve weeks of a strength log
- How to log your workouts in under a minute